Dear readers of our ALMA Newsletter,
At the time of writing this Newsletter we can clearly see the path to the start of ALMA Early Science. There are nine antennas operating at the Array Operations Site, first test images and spectra have been released, and the timeline and approach that will be adopted for Early Science Cycle 0 has just been announced.
This marks a tremendous achievement for all those people from around the world who have worked so hard to deliver the challenge that is ALMA. I encourage everyone who has played a part in ALMA to date, and everyone who is working hard to continue to deliver the project, to pause and reflect on those achievements. As the ALMA Board said in its public statement regarding Early Science after its Santiago meeting in November 2010:
While many challenges remain, it is already clear that ALMA “works”
In the coming months the ALMA Science Team will conduct Science Verification observations to test and demonstrate the performance of the array. Data from these observations will be released publicly so that astronomers outside the project can start to work directly with ALMA data. Suggestions for Science Verification targets and observations to complement the plans of the ALMA Science Team are encouraged, and more information about how to contribute is included in the body of this Newsletter.
The leadup to Early Science marks a time of great activity across the entire ALMA effort. In particular, the efforts of the ALMA Regional Centres (ARCs) operated by the Executives in East Asia, Europe and North America, the NAOJ, ESO and NRAO, are working extremely hard together with the JAO’s Department of Science Operations to ensure that the astronomers who will apply to use ALMA and those who are successful in being awarded time are all supported efficiently and effectively. It is the ARCs that will provide the interface between ALMA and the astronomers that will use it and so their role in Early Science – and of course in ongoing Science Operations – is paramount. A great deal of energy is being devoted to preparing and providing information about how to apply for ALMA time and how to use ALMA and its data products. A number of workshops being offered by the ARCs are noted in this Newsletter, and we invite everybody interested in using ALMA to participate in these events.
At the start of 2011 the scene at the Operations Support Facility is also quite remarkable. On any given day there are 500-600 people at the site working to deliver ALMA, and there are more than 20 antennas in various stages of assemble in the site erection facilities of the three vendors and on the pads behind the OSF Technical Facility. At around the same time as the ALMA project starts Early Science it will also reach the peak rate of delivery and integration of antennas and other subsystems into the array. Early Science will therefore require a delicate balancing act, with the clear intention being to deliver exciting science while not unduly delaying completion of the full array. At the start of Cycle 0 ALMA will offer capabilities that rival the best millimeter/submillimeter arrays available today, and we are all focussed on delivering the full ALMA capabilities as soon as we can.
Here’s to an exciting, prosperous, and scientifically rewarding 2011.
Enjoy ALMA’s universe!
Lewis Ball, ALMA Deputy Director
The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), an international astronomy facility, is a partnership of Europe, North America and East Asia in cooperation with the Republic of Chile. ALMA is funded in Europe by the European Organization for Astronomical Research in the Southern Hemisphere (ESO), in North America by the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) in cooperation with the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) and the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC) and in East Asia by the National Institutes of Natural Sciences (NINS) of Japan in cooperation with the Academia Sinica (AS) in Taiwan. ALMA construction and operations are led on behalf of Europe by ESO, on behalf of North America by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory (NRAO), which is managed by Associated Universities, Inc. (AUI) and on behalf of East Asia by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan (NAOJ). The Joint ALMA Observatory (JAO) provides the unified leadership and management of the construction, commissioning and operation of ALMA.
The Joint ALMA Observatory (JAO) expects to start Early Science observations (Cycle 0) on a best effort basis late in 2011 and a call for proposals will be issued at the end of the first quarter of 2011. The purpose of Early Science will be to deliver scientifically useful results to the astronomy community and to facilitate the ongoing characterization of ALMA systems and instrumentation as the capability of the array continues to grow. Early Science will not be allowed to delay unduly the construction of the full 66-antenna array, but nonetheless provides an important opportunity for first science from this cutting edge facility. Early Science will continue through Cycle 1 and until construction of the ALMA array is complete.
The first release of ALMA test data to the astronomy community will be through the Science Verification program. Science Verification will involve observations of objects designed to test ALMA systems and confirm their performance. The first data from these tests will be available by the time of the ALMA Early Science Cycle 0 Call for Proposals.
The ALMA Early Science Cycle 0 capabilities will comprise sixteen 12-m antennas, receiver bands 3, 6, 7 & 9 (wavelengths of about 3, 1.3, 0.8 and 0.45 mm), baselines up to 250m, single field imaging, and a restricted set of spectral modes chosen to meet a reasonable range of scientific goals. Additional capabilities including somewhat longer baselines, limited mosaic imaging, and some polarization capabilities, may be announced in the Call for Proposals.
ALMA Early Science Cycle 0 is expected to span 9 months. It is anticipated that 500-700 hours of array time will be available for Early Science projects. Any astronomer may submit a proposal in response to the ALMA Early Science Cycle 0 Call for Proposals. Proposals that best demonstrate and exploit the advertised ALMA Early Science Cycle 0 capabilities, producing scientifically worthwhile results from relatively short observations (averaging a few hours), will be given preference. Proposals will be assessed by peer review, and ranked strictly on the basis of scientific quality and feasibility with respect to the (fixed) scientific capabilities offered in the formal Call for Proposals. Projects will not be carried over from Cycle 0 to later cycles (even if they have not been completed in Cycle 0), and will not establish proprietary rights beyond those provided by the ALMA data policy. Moreover, data rights of these projects cannot block later observations with enhanced capabilities.
Successful proposers for Early Science Cycle 0 will share risk with ALMA. ALMA staff will conduct quality assurance on ALMA data, and will provide reduced data products through the respective ALMA Regional Centers (ARCs). However, it cannot be guaranteed that projects will be completed or that the characterization and quality of the data and data reduction will meet the standards expected when ALMA is in full scientific operations. Proposers should anticipate that significant experience in radio (in particular, millimeter) interferometry will be an advantage in working with the data products during ALMA Early Science. PIs and observing teams should anticipate the need to invest their own time and expertise in the analysis of ALMA Early Science data products, including the possible need to visit the relevant ARC to assist with quality assurance and data reduction. Collaboration with ALMA staff members at the ARCs or JAO can be arranged for interested PIs who are concerned that they may not have the requisite experience to make full use of their ALMA data during this period.
ALMA’s Proposal Review Committee
ALMA’s Proposal Review Committee, responsible for the overall ranking of all ALMA proposals, will be Chaired by Professor Neal Evans of the University of Texas. Professor Evans is a renowned expert in star formation and molecular clouds with an impressive track record in mm, submm and IR observational astronomy. He is a past member of the National Research Council’s Committee on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Past Chair of the National Radio Astronomy Observatory’s Program Advisory Committee, and Past Chair of the ALMA Scientific Advisory Committee. Professor Evans has accepted the appointment as APRC Chair for three years, effectively covering Cycles 0, 1 and 2 of ALMA Science Operations.
As many of you are aware, ALMA has reached a very exciting point in the construction phase. After a year of testing the basic functionality of antennas and small arrays at the Chajnantor site at 5000m, we are now able to run full observations of scientific targets using at least 8 antennas and 4 receiver bands. We recently had a series of reviews of all aspects of the ALMA Project, resulting in a consensus that we will be ready to issue a Call for Proposals for Early Science projects at the end of the first quarter of 2011, with an expectation of starting these Early Science observations toward the end of 2011.
ALMA Science Verification is the process by which we will demonstrate that the data that will be produced by ALMA during Early Science is valid. This is done by running full “end to end” tests of ALMA as a telescope. We will observe objects for which similar data are already available for other telescopes. This allows us to make direct quantitative comparisons of all aspects of the data cubes, in order to determine whether the ALMA instrumentation or software is introducing any artifacts.
This process is getting underway now (January 2011) as we set about testing the validity of data produced with the basic capabilities that have been commissioned so far. To start with, we will be using about 8 antennas on baselines of ~20 to 100 meters with receiver bands 3, 6, 7 and 9. Scientific Verification will continue in stages for the next several years as additional capabilities are brought into operation. When we have data sets that we consider to be valid, we will release them to the community - i.e. make them available for download - both in processed form (calibrated images and data cubes) and as raw data (measured visibilities together with the calibration observations). This will illustrate the capabilities of ALMA and provide prospective users with example data sets for learning how to process ALMA data using CASA. It will also provide opportunities for astronomers to understand the strategies for successful interferometric submillimeter observations with ALMA.
These are the requirements that we plan to test in the current phase:
Note that we need to check the performance over the whole frequency range (84GHz to 720GHz at this stage) and in general we will need to use different objects in different bands.
We are in the process of drawing up the matrix of observations and objects that will be used to perform the Science Verification. A draft of this is given in Table 1.
We invite the community to send us suggestions for sources to be added to this list. The main criteria are that there are existing good data (ideally in numerical form, but this is not essential) in at least one of the frequency bands we are using and that the object has properties that will enable us to make quantitative tests of one or more of the above requirements. Targets suitable for Science Verification at this point should be matched to the current compact array (baselines of ~20 to 100 meters). It will be possible to use ALMA Bands 3, 6, 7 and 9 or a combination of those. Single field imaging will be available with tracks long enough to provide sufficient u,v coverage for satisfactory imaging, and a range of correlator modes can be used with spectral resolution from about 15 MHz down to 30 kHz.
Obviously the objects need to be visible from the ALMA site (latitude -23 degrees); for the present phase it would be best if they transit at night during the coming months (LST ~ 5 to 15 hrs). Since the data will be released publicly, making suggestions will not give you any special rights nor advanced access to the data, but we will make sure that credit for the suggestion is given on our web page when the data are released. We will be glad to involve you in the discussion of issues like the quality of the existing data.
Suggestions should include a couple of paragraphs explaining why the proposed target is appropriate and what pre-existing data can be made available for comparison. The ALMA Project Scientist will review the incoming suggestions and will inform contributors of the outcome. If an object is added to the Science Verification matrix, the decision to actually implement it will be made by the JAO science team.
In this issue we are presenting the first test images taken with up to eight of the ALMA antennas. These images were just the byproduct of a series of vigorous tests of the hardware and software components of the whole system made during the second half of 2010. No special effort has been made to obtain the best possible UV coverage or calibration. Some of the images were made with all eight antennas available at that time, others just with a subset. Therefore the images should not be used to draw scientific conclusions on the observed objects or to question existing observations. The purpose of this series of pictures is to, hopefully, convince readers of this newsletter that ALMA is going to be reality very soon.
Let us recall what had to come together to make this possible. The pace in which things happened at ALMA during the last few years has been breathtaking. Many members of the ALMA Board and Scientific Advisory Committee who visited the ALMA site in November 2010 also had visited Chajnantor, the “High Site”, almost exactly a year before. Then we had three antennas at the site, now eight antennas were forming an array. Then we could perform measurements with single antennas or with pairs of them, which demonstrated that the system was working. Now we show images taken with receivers sensitive from wavelengths of 3 mm down to 0.43 mm: these are real images, not just “fringes” (which tell you something about the quality of a telescope but not everything). Two years ago, we were testing single antennas at the Operations Support Facility (OSF), the “Low Site”. At that time we could not yet combine the signals of two antennas to produce even a fringe. And three and a half years ago, the first antennas had just arrived at the Low Site in order to be assembled and tested.
The antennas are the most visible part of our observatory. The images shown were made using seven antennas delivered by the North American vendor Vertex and one antenna delivered by the East Asian vendor MELCO . At the time of writing there are six assembled antennas from the European antenna vendor at the OSF and the first of these is expected to be added to the array around the middle of 2011 . These antennas were prefabricated in Japan, the USA or different European countries and assembled by the vendors in the vendors’ camps. The manufacturers not only assembled the antennas but also performed first tests to check that they actually could meet the very stringent specifications needed for ALMA.
As soon as an antenna left the manufacturer’s camp, it was tested by a team of astronomers and engineers from the “Assembly, Integration and Verification” (AIV) group. In fact, there has always been a very close and genuine collaboration between staff from AIV, from the Commissioning and Science Verification Team, from the Operations group and also from the various Integrated Project Teams (IPT), such as Computing or Antenna IPTs. During the AIV phase, we went through the list of specifications for each of the antennas that were involved in the pictures shown, and also tested other components of the system in order to prove for example that they can track any source in the sky with sufficient accuracy. We also checked that the surface of the antennas matched its ideal parabolic form within less than 20 microns. Sometimes the specifications for the antennas were so stringent that it was a challenge to devise a test to check that these are met. Of course, the different steps of this process are (and will have to be) undertaken for all the remaining antennas that we will receive from the manufacturers till the end of the construction. These antennas represent certainly the state of the art, thanks to the expert knowledge and dedication of very skilled engineers and technicians (at the manufacturers but also among JAO staff and the IPTs).
The antennas are only one part of the system that makes images as the ones shown possible. The antennas used to take the sample images were equipped with four different receiver systems sensitive at some main atmospheric windows, namely around wavelengths of 3mm (band 3, frequency ~100 GHz), 1.3mm (band 6, 230 GHz), 0.9mm (band 7, 345 GHz) and 0.45 mm (band 9, 690 GHz). These four bands do not represent the final state of ALMA’s wavelength coverage but a large part of it. The ALMA receivers stand out because of their low noise performance and because of the large wavelength range that can be observed simultaneously. In fact, in each antenna there was a fifth auxiliary receiver, the “water vapor radiometer” (WVR), that is used to measure the amount of water vapor present in the atmosphere at each instant and thus can correct for the blurring effects of the atmosphere. We were amazed that this method to improve the image quality worked almost straightaway. In fact, without this WVR, especially the image in band 9 toward NGC 253 would lack much of its detail. (see more details about this in the #6 ALMA Science Newsletter).
To make interferometry work, one has to combine the incoming signals in such a way that the difference in the length of the signal path is a small fraction of the shortest wavelengths used. To ensure that the positions of the massive antenna pads are always known better than a few hundredths of a millimeter or to measure the tiny changes in the lengths of the cables used is not a trivial task. Time signals that control the data have to be in phase and very exact. The images are a compliment to the mechanical and electronic engineers and technicians who helped to achieve such an incredible precision.
The brain of our observatory is the correlator, where the incoming signals from the antennas are related to each other to produce the so-called visibilities. This correlator is one of the most powerful and complex computers on Earth, and it was specially designed for ALMA. There were many ways to do it wrong and just one way to produce the images shown. (see the in-depth article of this newsletter to read more details about the correlator).
Finally, there is the incredible amount of work that went into the software to ensure that the antenna is pointing in the right direction of the sky, to control the correlators and other electronics and to convert the “visibilities” into nice images. There are millions of lines of code involved in making this all work.
A lot had to come together at the same time to produce our images. Let us remind that ALMA is not only technologically and scientifically one of the most advanced projects in astronomy. It is also at a very remote place of this planet at one of the highest sites where people work. That makes construction, infrastructure, maintenance, logistics, communications and safety so important, and at the same time such a challenge for our project. And do not forget the fact that people from many nationalities and cultural background work together to achieve our ambitious goals. Astronomers, technicians, engineers and also administrators have been working hard for more than 20 years to make images like the ones shown possible.
The pictures presented are, as the ALMA Board stated in its November 2010 meeting, a proof that “ALMA works”, but the Board also reminds us that there still remain challenges. The images indicate that ALMA in its present state already would play in the same league as the world’s best millimeter and sub-millimeter observatories. But still many things are missing until ALMA reaches its full capabilities.
First of all, there will be more antennas. The more antennas, the more combinations between antenna pairs (“the baselines”). The more baselines, the crisper the images. With 8 antennas, we now have 28 baselines; with 16 antennas we will have 120 baselines. Think of the baselines as pixels in an image (although it is not the whole truth) and you can imagine how much our images will have improved in a year from now.
Of course we will integrate European antennas into the array. There is little doubt that also these antennas will perform well. The maximum distance between antennas defines the finest angular resolution of an image. Now all antennas are packed within a very compact array of about 100 m. Soon we will have them spread out in an area measuring several kilometers across. Think of it as a zoom lens with 30 or 100 times magnification. That will add even more details to our images. It will also be the next big challenge, since with increasing distance between the antennas also increase the difficulties to control the lengths of the signal paths within a fraction of a wavelength, and also the adverse effects of the atmosphere. So far we reproduced what has been achieved at several observatories. What now comes will be combinations of baselines and wavelengths that are still unexplored.
What, however, seems almost inevitable is that in a few years from now, ALMA will revolutionize earth bound astronomy and that new and unexpected discoveries will be owed to this instrument.
Some more explanations about the first ALMA test images
ALMA’s motto “In search of our Cosmic Origins” will describe much of its scientific program. The Greek astronomers saw the Universe as something static, non evolving. The motion of stars was not related to our existence and our lives. At most, astronomers used the stars to tell the time of the day or the year, or to orient themselves when traveling. This static view of the Universe changed at the beginning of the 20th century when physicists realized that stars cannot live for ever: they are still forming and dying. Likewise larger structures in the Universe, such as the galaxies have their life cycles, and finally, the universe as a whole had its beginning. The material out of which our Sun, the Earth and the other planets formed was not just plain hydrogen and helium, but it contained heavier atoms such as carbon, oxygen or iron which formed molecules that, in a process that we still not understand, make life on Earth possible.
Here is a short synopsis regarding the recent progress of the site construction work:
As has been the pattern for the last few months as far as ALMA antennas are concerned, we have been working on two main areas – investigating the outstanding technical issues and carrying out end-to-end tests, in which we create scheduling blocks, execute them and process the data (some examples of data from the end-to-end testing are displayed in the “Focus on” section of this newsletter).
The system has generally been performing well with the antenna availability, for the eight antennas, again running at over 90% on average and the software being in a reasonably stable condition and looking promising.
Since a ninth antenna joined the other eight at Chajnantor plateau on December 12, 2010, testing of the system on ~600m baselines was started and so far no unexpected problems have been found. We are trying to collect as much data as possible on atmospheric effects and on the validity of our phase correction techniques while the antennas are in this configuration.
We are now pursuing polarization measurements seriously and the initial results are promising. Here is a plot of the combined “cross-hands” correlations (essentially Stokes’ U in the antenna frame) on the quasar J1922 − 293, which is known to have a relatively high degree of linear polarization and passes close to the zenith at the ALMA site.
We had a very useful visit from Masumi Shimojo, a solar radio astronomy expert from Nobeyama, who is going to start working with us on establishing the solar observing capabilities of ALMA. An outline plan to enable us to offer solar observing in the Cycle 1 call was drawn up but this is critically dependent on the delivery of the solar filters.
At the European Antennas assembly site, there are presently 7 antennas. Antennas 1 and 2 are in formal acceptance testing, with the first one in advanced verification of the pointing performance and having started the holography verification work of the primary reflector surface. In terms of absolute pointing the obtained performances are at a level of 1 arc second or better and presently the stability of the pointing model is being verified, in parallel with the commissioning of the thermal metrology system. Offset pointing verification was started in December and the first results are promising. Fast switching verification also started and based on the results obtained so far it is expected that the specified performance will be obtained, although the full blown test program has not started yet. Presently the surface of the primary reflector of antenna 1 is set at around 13 micrometer RMS. Science related performance testing of the 2nd antenna started in December and covered only all-sky pointing tests with results very similar to those obtained on antenna #1.
Beyond the science related performance, a number of engineering verifications are on-going on both the first and the 2nd antennas. The test program foresees to verify all design related performances on the first two units except for the aspects of maintainability which will be verified on antenna number 3 as soon as it becomes formally available for testing.
Antenna 3 and 4 are under power and are being commissioned. The antenna number 3 is planned to undergo formal review for start of testing in a few weeks. Antennas 5 and 6 are mechanically assembled and work has started on antenna 7 and on the reflector of antenna number 8. The 8th and the 9th antennas are due to arrive at the OSF before the end of January.
An additional integration and testing pad (7 are presently available) is being constructed at the assembly area to allow parallel work on 8 antennas, and obtain a risk reduction on the overall antenna project duration.
At the North American Assembly site, six Vertex antennas are in different stages of construction. Just like every antenna to eventually join the ALMA array, these are submitted to more than 200 tests before going through the whole acceptance process, critical step before being moved to the OSF for further testing and integration, and finally to the Chajnantor plateau.
At the East Asian antennas assembly site, some final acceptance tests on the fourth 12m MELCO (Mitsubishi Electrical Company) antenna are being conducted aiming at accepting this antenna in the coming weeks. In addition, the first four 7-m antennas arrived in Chile in September and went through assembly and initial testing. The test activities aiming at acceptance of the first 7m antenna are starting this month.
At the same time, the Assembly, Integration and Verification team is busy working on several antennas at the OSF.
Operations Support Facility
People working at ALMA (both staff and contractors) are currently hosted in comfortable dormitories, full equipped with television, Internet and individual bathroom. Eventually, when the construction is complete, ALMA staff will be accommodated in a definitive Residence. The design of the Residence was completed last November and the release of the call for tenders should happen very soon.
Array Operations Site
The installation of power and signal connections to the central cluster antenna stations resumed beginning of January. The completion of the work is expected by end of March. Furthermore, the AOS road network construction has been also resumed.
The new fiber link connecting OSF and AOS computers became available on Dec.15. Since then it has been in use with the ALMA software with a bandwidth of 1 Gb/s (Gigabit/sec). The expected reliability is higher than with the previous temporary link, which included two microwave segments. The new link allows also to transmit at much higher data rates from the correlator, which is important in view of the increasing number of antennas. Eventually the new link will include also two more fiber pairs at 10 Gb/s, while the old temporary link will remain as a back-up
The ALMA Correlators
Two Correlator sub-systems have been constructed for the ALMA project, one for the Main Array of 12-m antennas and one for the ALMA Compact Array (ACA). Both sub-systems combine the astronomical signals captured by the ALMA antennas to form the images which will be interpreted and modeled by the astronomers. These Correlators also have the ability to analyze the spectral content of the incoming radiation ; in particular, they allow us to identify or discover the molecular and atomic species present in the nearby or distant cold Universe where new generations of stars are being formed. The ALMA Correlators can be seen as highly specialized ‘super-computing’ machines operated with no hard disks at the highest site ever used for astronomical programs. The 17 peta-operations per second performed by the Main Array Correlator may be compared with the fastest and latest generation of super computers operating in the petaflop domain. In this article we briefly introduce the basic principles of correlation and outline some of the architectural differences between the Main Array and ACA Correlators. We present the main technical characteristics of the Main Array Correlator and give some details on its observing modes and performance. Finally, we summarize the present status of these two powerful Correlator sub-systems and recall that several groups across the world were involved in their construction.
ALMA is a highly sensitive and flexible imaging array, which combines the millimetre/submillimetre signals captured by all antennas deployed on the Chajnantor plateau in two correlator sub-systems. The ALMA correlators are powerful digital machines whose flexibility make them key elements of all future ALMA science programs, including Early Science projects. They process a total bandwidth of 8 GHz in each of two different senses of polarization and combine the signals from up to NA antennas (where NA = 64 or 16) movable across the ALMA site within a diameter of about 18 km to 150 m (or even less for the most compact array, the ALMA Compact Array or ACA). Once the input signal voltages have been digitized in specific analog-to-digital converter circuits and combined in the ALMA correlators we obtain: (a) the amplitude and phase information contained in the interferometric fringe pattern of NA(NA-1)/2 independent antenna pairs, and (b) the received power for all NA antennas. These data are first appropriately calibrated then processed further to produce the ALMA astronomical images in several spectral channels of the input bandwidth. The spectral images represent the ultimate products required by the astronomers to understand the structure and physical processes at work in the observed sources.
A first ALMA correlator, the main array or baseline correlator, was constructed by an NRAO/European team to process up to NA = 64 antennas. (50 12-m antennas are being constructed for the main array but 64 antennas was the initial number in the ALMA project.) The main array correlator combines data from 64x63/2 = 2016 independent antenna pairs. A second correlator, the ALMA Compact Array (ACA) correlator was constructed by a Japanese consortium to process 16 antennas and produce interferometric patterns for 120 antenna pair combinations. (The ACA consists of twelve 7-m diameter dishes to which four other 12-m diameter dishes -the ACA total power sub-array- have been added.)
These two correlators are run as stand-alone machines, but the calibrated images produced at the post-correlation stage for similar frequency profiles will be merged in several projects to deliver a complete picture of the extended and compact spatial structure present in many astronomical sources. In addition, to maximize sensitivity we expect that for a number of projects the main array correlator will process the data collected by both the main array and several antennas of the ACA. This is feasible because all ALMA antennas have identical data formats and because the patch-panel sub-system connecting with optic fibers the antennas to the main array correlator room can be configured in several different ways.
To understand the basic principles of signal correlation it is useful to derive the interferometer response of a single antenna pair, the basic element of any array of antennas. The wave signals from a celestial source, or voltage signals, collected by the antennas are first converted to a frequency range that allows to amplify these input signals. This operation, named heterodyne detection, is performed in the Front-End receivers except for ALMA bands 1 and 2 for which the signal is directly amplified. The amplified signals are later combined in a multiplier and integrated over short periods of time. Signal multiplication and time averaging form the core of the correlation process. This is schematically shown in Fig. 1 where, as usual in all modern correlators, the anlaog signal is converted into a limited number of digits (signal digitization) prior to multiplication.
The high frequency component resulting from multiplication of the two signal voltages is filtered out whereas the low frequency product is the 2-antenna interferometer response at the correlator output. This response shows a sinusoidal pattern, the interferometer fringes, whose frequency depends on the observing frequency and the scalar product of the 2-antenna baseline vector with the unit vector to the source direction; the fringe frequency varies slowly with the source hour angle and the response is not distorted by short integrations. The interferometer amplitude is proportional to the power received by the two antennas. In the 2-dimension treatment of the basic 2-element interferometer response the amplitude and phase of the fringe pattern at the correlator output allow to derive the complex source visibility and hence to know the source brigthness distribution on the sky*.
(*) More exactly, the visibility function is defined as the Fourier transform in the space frequency domain of the source brightness modified by the antenna power pattern. The visibility amplitude is directly related to the source extent with respect to the fringe spacing. For a point like source the phase information contains the source position once the array baselines have been calibrated (i.e. once the baseline extents and the baseline orientations with respect to the exact positions of distant quasars are known).
The above description of an interferometer is valid for a given frequency and for a narrow bandwidth. If this assumption is not fulfilled, i.e. if the passband of each antenna Front-End receiver is broad, it can be divided into independent narrow band channels providing as many independent interferometers. Broad band or multi-channel analysis is required to understand the physics at the origin of the radiation mechanisms of many astronomical sources, and also to provide better sensitivity. In the case of the molecular or atomic radiation emitted by interstellar or circumstellar clouds in very specific frequency ranges, interferometry is required in several relatively narrow frequency channels to image these clouds and understand their kinematics. As explained later, spectral capability is relatively easy to implement in digital correlators and we do not have to build as many independent interferometers as we wish to have spectral channels.
In the early days of radio astronomy, combination of the signals from an antenna pair was achieved by summing the two signals in a square law detector. The ‘adding interferometer’ is the equivalent in the radio domain of the Michelson interferometer. The low frequency output of the square law detector contains the interferometer fringe pattern whose frequency varies slowly with time while the fringe amplitude is related to the source size. The major drawback of the adding interferometer is the presence of a constant term or response offset which drifts with time and cannot be easily eliminated. Instead of adding and detecting the captured signals, all modern radio interferometers provide the cross correlation i.e. multiplication of the input signals, thus eliminating all incoherent sources of noise along the two arms of each 2-antenna interferometer (electronics noise) and above each antenna (sky noise).
Spectral correlation and XF-FX architectures
Cross correlation is accomplished in a digital multiplier and integrator as schematically shown in Fig. 1 after the voltages collected at all antennas have been digitized. Formally, cross correlation for an antenna pair (i,j) providing the signal voltages Vi (k tS) and Vj (k tS) sampled at time t = k tS over a large number of samples, varies as the sum:
Pij(p tS) = Σk Vi (k tS) Vj (k tS+p tS)
where tS is the discrete time interval between samples and k and p are integers. The integer p which varies in discrete steps up to an adopted maximum value pMax (where pMax remains always very small compared to the total number of processed samples) is introduced to define a time offset p tS (or time lag) and its associated Fourier transform to the frequency domain a frequency ‘channel’. There are as many values of Pij as we have values of the time offsets and, in the associated Fourier space, the frequency separation between channels can be specified once pMax and tS are known (see below). The summed products Pij when they have been properly normalized and calibrated in terms of the broad band noise standard deviation are also called the cross correlation coefficients*.
(*) The input signals are both sampled and quantized in the digitizers, and the actual cross correlation coefficient is slightly different from the formal or ‘true’ cross correlation defined above. In practice the products
The time interval between two digitized signal samples, tS, is derived from the sampling frequency which is directly related to the ALMA basic frequency interval, or ALMA baseband B= 2 GHz. (The ALMA baseband is defined as the fourth of the total instantaneous bandwidth, 8 GHz, in each of two polarizations.) In the Nyquist sampling case tS = 1/2B which implies a high data rate of 4 109 samples per second in the ALMA case (tS = 250 psec). If the cross correlation measurements are made for 2pMax time offsets, i.e. -pMax tS , …, 0, … (pMax – 1) tS, then the Fourier transform of the discretized cross correlation function provides the cross
power spectrum at the discrete spectral intervals 1/(2pMax tS). Therefore, for Nyquist sampling, the spectral interval or frequency channel separation is B/pMax.*
(*) The total number of time offsets 2pMax used to derive Pij(p tS ) is very small compared to the number of samples processed in the cross correlator; this limitation degrades the spectral resolution to about 1.2 times the spectral interval between channels.
The cross correlation measurements are performed in the ‘baseline electronics’ part of the spectral correlator schematically represented in Fig. 2. The correlation products are derived in multipliers and accumulators, the MAC cells, where MAC stands for data multiplication and accumulation. Each arm of the 2-element interferometer processing the input signals for the (i,j) antenna pair is delayed with respect to the other one by 1 tS, 2 tS, etc. (see Fig. 2). All cross products are then sent to a Long Term Accumulator (LTA) which accumulates the correlation functions. Finally, the cross power spectrum which contains the spectral information of interest to the atsronomer is obtained in the Fourier Transform (FT) processor which performs a discrete Fourier transform of the correlation functions. The ‘antenna electronics’ and ‘baseline electronics’ together with the FT processor form the digital spectral correlator system. The final outputs of this large system are the source visibilty functions for several narrow frequency channels across the input bandwidth and for all antenna pairs in the array. They allow the astronomers to build the 2-dimension spectral images of the observed sources as especially required for spectral line observations. If the astronomical sources do not exhibit rapid variations with frequency the astronomers can select a digital correlator configuration with less spectral channels which is then better suited to ‘continuum’ observations (as opposed to spectral line observations), and eventually measure the average cross correlation product across the entire signal bandwidth.
The digital spectral or continuum cross correlators used to image astronomical sources with relatively narrow or broad band spectra are designated as XF correlators, or lag correlators, where X represents the cross-correlation part of the signal processing and F stands for the Fourier transform. In terms of signal processing it is fully equivalent to construct correlators based on the XF or FX architecture. In the latter case conversion to the frequency domain (F-part) is performed in a real time fast Fourier transform (FFT) circuit whose outputs are multiplied (X-part) to provide the cross power spectrum*.
(*) One way to implement the FX correlator consists in sending input data streams of 2nS samples to the FFT circuit of each antenna which then provides ns complex signal amplitudes (cosine and sine outputs). The sample length, 2nS, is chosen to optimize the FFT algorithm. The FFT complex amplitudes are later multiplied with the amplitudes from all other antennas in the array to form ns values of cross power spectrum. After FFT transformation the discrete frequency interval is given by 1/2nStS or B/nS in the Nyquist sampling case.
With the XF architecture much complexity is embedded in the correlation part and increases in proportion with NA(NA-1)/2 (or roughly with the square of the number of antennas) whereas for the FX architecture, Fourier transformation is performed in proportion with the number of antennas. Both architectures have been adopted for the ALMA project. The FX correlator built by the Japanese team processes the signals captured by 16 antennas of the ACA. The main array correlator constructed by the NRAO/European team to process up to 64 antennas is not exactly an XF design but incorporates the European concept of Second Generation Correlator in which the input baseband is digitally split into several frequency-mobile subbands (this is performed in the Digital Processing box of Fig. 2 and, more precisely, in the Tunable Filter Bank Card box of Fig. 3) ; higher flexibility and higher spectral resolution are thus implemented in the main array correlator as described later (see sub-sections on Filtering and Modes). The main array correlator architecture is in fact a digital hybrid XF design or FXF. However, when frequency division of the input baseband is bypassed, then the main array correlator behaves as a pure XF system ; both operating modes are offered to the users (see FDM and TDM modes below).
ALMA main array correlator : technical details and performance
The top level specifications of the main array correlator are gathered in Table 1. (Most of these specifications, baseband inputs/antenna, input sample format, 2-bit 4-level output sample format and number of polarization products are also common to the ACA correlator.) Among the difficulties met by the designers of the main array correlator one may highlight processing a very broad bandwidth (16 GHz in total) for each of 64 antennas and implementing spectral flexibility to provide high or low resolution and selectable spectral windows across the input baseband.
Table1: Top level specifications of the ALMA main array correlator
Digitization and Filtering
Digitization, that is to say sampling and quantization of the input signal to convert the analog voltage into a digital data flow is a critical step in the ALMA processing chain because it is performed at the antennas soon after the Front-End receivers and for a broad bandwidth (2 to 4 GHz). Digitization of the ALMA baseband requires 4 Gsamples/second digitizers and, according to the ALMA specification, each sample is 3-bit encoded (8 quantization levels). Correlation cannot be performed at the 4 GHz clock rate of the ALMA digitizers, therefore the data flow is demultiplexed to provide much lower frequency signals allowing to ultimately process the data at 250/125 MHz clock rates ; this is achieved in a specific 1:16 demultiplexing stage provided in the digitizer assemblies. The resulting lower frequency parallel bit stream is transmitted from each antenna to the correlator room through optical fibers.
Baseband frequency division is accomplished in the Tunable Filter Bank (TFB) cards which divide the 2 GHz input bandwidth into 32 frequency-agile subbands of 62.5 MHz. Subband extraction is the result of a digital 3-stage digital filter design implemented in a programmable logic device (a Field Programmable Gate Array or FPGA). The last stage of the digital filter strongly determines the filter properties (passband ripple, stopband rejection, use or not of pre-calculated digital weights to narrow the subband further). A commercial large FPGA device using 90 nanometer technology (i.e. the smallest circuit prints in the FPGA are around 90 nanometers) has been selected for the TFB cards. 16 FPGA’s are required to implement all 32 subbands in a single card. There are as many as 8 TFB cards per antenna (see Station Electronics TFB blocks in Fig. 3), and 512 cards are required for the full 64-antenna system. It is important to stress that digital filtering offers many advantages in terms of flexibilty or performance reproducibility (e.g. stability with respect to thermal drifts).
All cross products for the full array of 64 antennas are derived in 32 correlator ‘planes’ shown in the ‘Correlator Array’ of Fig. 3. A correlator plane is a 64x64 matrix in which a total of 256 specific integrated circuits (the correlator chips) are used to multiply the signal by its time shifted version (time lag) for all independent antenna pairs in the array. One correlator plane processes one baseband in two different polarizations and places the 64x64 matrix in four correlator printed circuit cards. These four cards are the ‘lags’ and ‘leads’ cards (each providing 64x63/2 cross correlation products) and two other cards providing the auto-correlation coefficients for all 64 antennas. There are 64 correlator chips per correlator card in order to keep a reasonable physical size for the correlator card and also to facilitate power dissipation and thus the cooling. The basic element in one correlator chip is a 256-lag block in which one lag corresponds to the MAC cell shown in Fig. 2. Each 256-lag block can be configured to support single or double polarization observations or to produce all 4 cross products for full Stokes parameters analysis*.
(*) One MAC cell or lag circuit includes a 2-bit x 2-bit multiplier, a multi-bits accumulator and an output register. The basic element being a 256-lag block, there are 16 x 256-lag blocks in one correlator chip for a total of 4096 lags per chip. When the elemental 256-lag block is configured to produce all four cross products for full polarization analysis there are only 64 lags available per cross product ; there are twice more lags for double polarization without cross products.
Each of the 32 digital subbands extracted in the TFB cards is assigned to one of the 32 correlator planes for signal correlation in the widest bandwidth mode. The resulting spectra are stitched together at a later stage to reconstruct a global spectrum with now 32 times more spectral channels across the baseband. To further enhance the spectral resolution one can assign all correlator plane resources to fewer than 32 subbands. In that case the total input bandwidth is less than the original 2 GHz baseband and can be narrowed in powers of two down to 62.5 MHz (or even to 31.25 MHz with special digital weights but with some restrictions).
Data transmission and rack architecture
Communication of antenna-based electronics with baseline-based electronics is a very difficult problem. The whole system with 64 possible antennas, 8 basebands per antenna and 32 demultiplexed signals (at 125 MHz clock rate) per baseband requires a total of 32768 rack-to-rack interfaces for 2-bit correlation per sample. In the ALMA correlator we multiplex the digital filter card outputs and use twice less cables,16384, carrying 250 MHz signals. The output phase of each cable is remotely controlled and adjusted for error-free data transmission.
The main array correlator is organised by quadrants each quadrant processing one baseband pair for the two different polarizations captured by each antenna. There are 8 racks per quadrant (4 Station Electronics and 4 Baseline Electronics racks) and a total of 32 racks for all 4 quadrants to which one must add the power supply racks, the Correlator Data Processor (where Fourier transformation to the frequency domain is performed) and the Correlator Control Computer racks. All racks are installed in the correlator room at the AOS (ALMA Operations Support) technical building (Fig. 4). One of the main concerns to operate the full system is power dissipation which directly impacts long term reliability. Because the air density at the AOS is about half that at sea level air circulation is forced under the correlator room floor. In addition, several fans are installed at the top of the station racks to improve heat dissipation at the level of the printed circuit cards and components. Temperature is remotely controlled throughout the racks and in the correlator room ; correlator shutdown is programmed in case of emergency. The full system including all computers dissipates around 130 kW ; air circulation in the correlator room is thus a critical question.
Broadly speaking the ALMA main array correlator supports two categories of observing modes the Time Division Modes (TDM) and the Frequency Division Modes (FDM). In the first case the correlator behaves as a pure XF system. 32 ‘time bins’ are first sent from the ‘Station Card’ (see Fig. 3) to the 32 correlator planes (each processing 1/32 of the digitizer samples). Then all time packet outputs from all 32 planes are summed at a later stage to keep up with the 4 Gsample rate of the antenna digitizers. TDM modes are adequate for relatively low spectral resolution (less lags availbale) and fast dump times (16 msec for cross correlation). In the FDM operation mode each of the 32 TFB card outputs (there are 32 subbands each 62.5 MHz for the 2 GHz input baseband) is processed in one of the 32 correlator planes. Narrower total bandwidths are obtained if not all subband outputs are processed. Higher spectral resolutions are then possible by sending the active filter outputs to all correlator lag resources; this is activated by appropriate addressing of the microcontroller in the ‘Station Card’ shown in Fig. 3. FDM modes are best suited to high spectral resolution and spectroscopic observations. A large number of FDM modes is offered to the user when one includes the ‘higher sensitivity’ double Nyquist and 4-bit x 4-bit correlation modes for which digitization efficiency is increased to 94% and 99%, respectively. The latter modes require more lag resources per input bandwidth and the spectral resolution is lowered. The 64-antenna correlator supports a total of 63 FDM and 4 TDM modes including the polarization options (one single polarization baseband and 2 basebands per quadrant with or without cross products). The highest spectral resolution, 3.8 kHz, is obtained for one baseband processed with specific digital weights downloaded in the last stage of the digital filter.
Examples of bandwidths and channel separation are given in Table 2 for two basebands (both polarizations) and 2-bit correlation.
Table 2: Effective bandwidth per baseband and spacing of spectral points for 2-bit correlation in frequency division mode (FDM) with 2 basebands processed (both polarizations). Spectral resolution is twice less for double Nyquist sampling but sensitivity is improved by 7%.
The bandwidth and resolution examples given in Table 2 are well suited to spectral line observations in a broad variety of astrophysical environments. The effective bandwidths cover most interesting cases for sources in our Galaxy and for nearby galaxies. This is illustrated in Table 3 in which we give (a) the typical velocity coverage observed in a number of sources and (b) the total bandwidth required to perform observations around for instance 89 and 602 GHz ; the spectral lines of abundant molecular species (HCO+ or HCN and methanol) are present near these two frequencies.
Table 3: Examples of total velocity coverage and total bandwidth required for line observations of galactic or extragalactic sources.
Supposing we need two polarizations, examples in Table 2 can be used to help select the total bandwidth and spectral resolution most appropriate to a given astrophysics environment. High resolution, say around 10 to 100 kHz, is well suited to the study of molecular line emission in protostellar discs, interstellar molecular clouds or Galactic masers. On the other hand, 1 MHz resolution is well adapted to the analysis for instance of the widespread CO lines emission observed in nearby galaxies or in Galactic outflows. Tables 2 and 3 suggest that this can achieved with effective bandwidths of 1.8 or 0.9 GHz and by binning spectral channels.
Coarser spectral resolution than shown in Table 2 is best suited to the observation of : (i) broad band continuum emission sources in the Galaxy or external galaxies, and (ii) spectral line sources in distant galaxies for which the total bandwidth must be broad. This is better achieved with the TDM operation mode. There are 3 TDM modes for 2-bit correlation providing 7.8, 15.6 or 31.3 MHz channel separation across 2 GHz (1.8 GHz effective bandwidth) if 1, 2 or 4 polarization products are selected, respectively. There is a fourth, higher sensitivity 3-bit correlation TDM mode, providing 31.25 MHz channel separation across 2 GHz ; it is available if only one 2 GHz baseband polarization channel is processed.
The basic modes described above apply to a single region, 2 GHz in the TDM case and, in the FDM case, to a single region selected from 2 GHz to 62.5 MHz (or 31.25 MHz). But the main array correlator architecture and firmware allow us to support other FDM and correlator planes combinations which we briefly describe below. All of them require, however, new software development from Computing Integrated Product Team in order to offer adequate users interfaces. In addition, some possibilities may just be limited by too high data rates –and these limitations have not yet been fully explored.
- Because FDM allows us to move the 62.5 MHz subbands anywhere within one 2 GHz baseband it is possible to ‘break’ the total bandwidth associated with a selected mode into multiple disjoint spectral regions (up to 4 ‘windows’ are implemented in practice). We can thus anlayze various spectral lines spread across the input bandwidth provided that all regions are multiples of 62.5 MHz and fit within 2 GHz.
- Multi-spectral resolution across different bandwidths is another option allowing to zoom on some complex spectral features. Each quadrant can be split into sub-units and each sub-unit can be operated with a different observing mode (e.g. different resolutions or polarization modes are selectable). The correlator resources available in all sub-units are limited of course by those available in the full 32 planes. (Note that with a single quadrant configured to support 4 basebands it is also possible to select FDM modes with different bandwidths and spectral resolutions in order to achieve multi-resolution.)
Even more configurations are possible. For instance, one can broaden the total bandwidth beyond 2 GHz by combining basebands within a quadrant or by combining quadrants. 1, 2 or 4 basebands are available for each polarization and the agregate maximum bandwidth is 8 GHz per polarization. One can also select FDM and TDM modes for simultaneous spectral line and continuum observations with two independent overlapping quadrants.
Finally, it is important to mention three other correlator configuration modes which will become available soon or in the near future : (a) Sideband separaration mode in which the correlator, in conjunction with 0-90° phase switching, separates the Front-End receiver mixer sidebands. This is required for the double sideband receivers in ALMA bands 9 and 10 and in other ALMA bands when sideband rejection is thought to be inadequate. (b) Subarraying which is the ability to operate in different observing modes independent subsets of antennas. Each correlator quadrant can support 2 or more subarrays. (c) Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI) observations involving the ALMA phased array (or a subset of the ALMA antennas) are possible with the main array correlator design because each correlator card can provide the summed outputs of up to 64 antennas. VLBI requires development of a a specific phasing and control software and additional hardware, mainly an hydrogen maser to replace the ALMA rubidium master frequency standard and a specific data recorder to which the summed antenna outputs are sent.
Status of the ALMA correlators
To conclude, we give brief indications on the ALMA correlators status and installation schedule. Installation and testing at the AOS of quadrant 1 of the main array correlator were completed in October 2008. Quadrant 1 supports up to 16 antennas and 4 baseband pairs. It is being used routinely by the AIV/CSV teams especially for ALMA science verification. The second and third quadrants have been installed at the AOS in the fall and summer of 2009 and 2010, respectively. In October 2010, the 2-quadrant configuration was commissioned and operated from the Correlator Control Computer and the engineering port. 2-quadrant operation will be available soon in 2011. With 2-quadrant configuration and appropriate control software, up to 32 antennas in the array and up to 4 baseband pairs will be available for ALMA Early Science. Full delivery to the users community, however, still requires some software development from Computing IPT.
The fourth quadrant has been constructed and is being operated at the integration center in Charlottesville. Installation at the AOS has been delayed to the second semester of 2011 in order to continue firmware and software development. All 4 quadrants of the main array correlator are needed to support more than 32 antennas (up to 64) and all 4 baseband pairs.
In parallel with the fabrication and installation of the main array correlator, two scaled down models of the large machine have been fabricated with exactly the same production TFB and correlator boards. These models are for 2-antenna operation ; one has been installed at the Operation Support Facility site since 2008 and is used for antenna equipment testing before newly outfitted antennas are moved to the high site.
The ACA Correlator is also built in quadrants. Two quadrants (Fig. 5) have already been successfully connected to 2 antennas on the ACA pads at the AOS in August, 2010. It is expected that all 4 quadrants will be delivered in 2011. When the two ALMA correlators will be fully delivered to the project it would be useful to compare or cross-calibrate the digital efficiency and spectral properties of these two large machines for a subset of ALMA antennas (up to 16, the maximum processed by the ACA correlator). A first investigation of the expected difference between the frequency profiles of the XF and FX correlators has been made by the Japanese team; it shows that frequency profile compatibility is possible as required to combine the main array and ACA images.
Teams involved in the construction
Several teams and a large number of people were involved in the construction of the two large correlator sub-systems. The 64-antenna correlator has been constructed by a consortium of laboratories within the ALMA Correlator Integrated Product Team organization supported by the North American and European ALMA Executives. The key correlation and filtering cards of the 64-antenna correlator were designed, prototyped and functionally tested in Charlottesville (NRAO) and Université of Bordeaux (LAB), respectively. Production of the ALMA 64-antenna correlator cards involved several industrial partners selected after competitive bidding to manufacture the printed circuit cards or the application specific integrated circuits and to assemble all components on the printed circuit cards. Acceptance of the production key cards was supported by specific card test fixtures and test procedures were designed by the Correlator IPT team.
The correlator quadrants have been first assembled and tested in Charlottesville before delivery to Chile at the AOS. Integrated testing of the 64-antenna correlator hardware and firmware embedded in several correlator cards as well as final acceptance at the correlator quadrant level were made possible thanks to the software developed by the correlator sub-group of the ALMA Computing Integrated Product Team. The frequency division mode concept and frequency-agile TFB design emerged in Europe in the years 2001 to 2003 within the 2nd Generation Correlator team which, in addition to incorporating their design in the initial NRAO correlator design, compared their performance and costs with the Japanese correlator project.
The ACA correlator has been constructed by the ACA Correlator team in Japan. This team comprised astronomers and engineers at NAOJ and engineers at FUJITSU Ltd., the sub-contractor. The FX design of the ACA correlator was initially proposed by NAOJ. All details of the final design are the result of the cooperative work of NAOJ and FUJITSU Ltd.. The sub-contractor is also responsible for fabrication, shipment, and assembly on site. Functional and performance testing for acceptance has been conducted by the ACA Correlator team with support of the ACA Correlator sub-group of the ALMA Computing Integrated Product Team.
ALMA Board Meeting & Statement on Early Science | Nov 15/18
“At its meeting on November 16th-18th 2010, the ALMA Board noted the tremendous recent progress in construction and commissioning of the array and recorded its thanks to the ALMA and regional Executive staff and contractors for their many contributions. Eight of the 66 antennas have already been deployed at the 5000-m elevation site. The accompanying test images illustrate the potential of the full array for unprecedented scientific discovery in the cold Universe.
In preparation for the commencement of Early Science, with a subset of the ALMA array capabilities, the Board received reports and recommendations from a number of comprehensive reviews of the ALMA project. The Board enthusiastically endorses the conclusions of the reviews, and of the Director, that ALMA is on track to begin Early Science observations late in 2011, as planned. While many challenges remain, it is already clear that ALMA “works”.
It is anticipated that the ALMA Director will issue a Call for Proposals for Early Science in the first quarter of 2011. That announcement will provide more details of the expected timeline and capabilities to be offered.”
The ALMA Board
New ALMA Key Personnel
Dr Lewis Ball joined ALMA in September 2010, as Deputy Director of the Joint ALMA Observatory. He joins us from Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO).
Lewis earned his PhD in Theoretical Physics from the University of Sydney. He spent 12 years as a researcher, first in Sweden and then in Australia, before moving into a research management role in CSIRO’s Australia Telescope National Facility (ATNF) in 2001. While at CSIRO, he held positions such as Deputy Officer in Charge of Parkes and Deputy Director of the ATNF, then joined CSIRO’s Executive Management Council as Acting Director of ATNF and Acting Chief of CSIRO’s new division of Astronomy and Space Science (CASS). Over the past year he successfully integrated the ATNF - operated by CSIRO for use by radio astronomers around the world - and the Canberra Deep Space Communication Complex (CDSCC) - operated by CSIRO for NASA as one of its three deep space tracking stations - to create CASS. The research themes that Lewis was responsible for were: “Astrophysics” which involves astronomical research conducted by in-house CSIRO astronomers; and “Technologies for Radio Astronomy” which involves engineering research and development that delivers cutting edge instrumentation for ATNF’s existing facilities, and for external contracts. He has led extensive consultation with the astronomical community and worked closely with the teams that will deliver the next generation radio telescope, the Australian SKA Pathfinder (ASKAP).
Lewis’s research background is in the theory of shocks, particle acceleration, synchrotron emission and inverse Compton scattering and their application to supernovae, supernova remnants, pulsar winds and radio/X-ray transients. Lewis pioneered the theory of gamma-ray emission from the winds of binary radio pulsars. His model for the binary pulsar B1259-63 led to the theoretical prediction that this system should be a detectable source of extremely energetic (TeV) gamma rays. His predictions were confirmed early in 2004 by observations made using the German telescope known as HESS (High Energy Stereoscopic System) located in Namibia.
Throughout his career, Lewis has pursued research emphasizing the link between theory and observation, first in magnetospheric physics and later in space physics and astrophysics. Together with his extensive management expertise, Lewis will strengthen the leadership in ALMA.
The impact of Herschel surveys on ALMA Early Science | Nov 17/19
The meeting on scientific synergies between Herschel surveys and ALMA Early Science was held in Garching in November 2010.
The participants provided for an exciting discussion and reassured that the Herschel community is fully engaged with the potentials of ALMA coming soon online.
The presentations and posters of the meeting are now available online at the workshop website: http://www.eso.org/sci/meetings/2010/almaherschel2010.html
There are positions for astronomers to be filled in Chile, both as members of the Commissioning Team and in Operations. Commissioning is part of the ALMA construction project and is of course focussed on getting all of the components fully working as a unique telescope and verifying the quality of the data coming out, so we are looking for people with particular interest in and experience of instrumentation and in-depth data analysis. The Science Operations team is now being built up and there are posts to be filled covering a wide range of activities, including instrumentation and data analysis but also planning and scheduling.
The Joint ALMA Observatory (JAO) invites applications for the position of:
Head of the Joint ALMA Observatory Program Management Group (Program Manager) and Deputy Head of the Joint ALMA Observatory Program Management Group (Deputy Program Manager)
The Program Managers lead the PMG and report directly to the Head of Science Operations. The primary purpose of these positions is to provide continuous leadership and management to the Program Management Group.
Main Duties and Responsibilities:
The incumbents have the following major responsibilities:
Deadline for receipt of applications to be considered for the position is 1 March, 2011.
ALMA Operations Astronomer
Successful candidates will work in the ALMA Program Management Group within the JAO Department of Science Operations. The JAO Department of Science Operations (DSO) is responsible for the ALMA observations. It consists of three groups: the Array Operations Group, the Program Management Group (PMG) and the Data Management Group (DMG).
The Program Management Group is responsible for the day-to-day management of observation execution, tracking of the status of ALMA programs, data quality control and coordination of these activities with the three ALMA Regional Centers (ARCs) located in Europe, North America and East Asia.
Main Duties and Responsibilities:
The responsibilities of the Operations astronomers include:
Deadline for receipt of applications to be considered for the position is 1 March, 2011.
Deputy Data Manager of the ALMA Data Management Group
The Deputy Data Manager reports directly to the Head of the Data Management Group and is foreseen to be in charge of the daily operations of the archives and the pipeline. The Deputy Data Manager will work closely with the ALMA Regional Centers as well as with the JAO Software Group and System Engineers.
Main Duties and Responsibilities:
The Deputy Data Manager supports the Head of DMG in the management of the group and is in charge of some of the daily operations of DMG. He/she has the following major responsibilities:
Before the start of ALMA early science operations (in 2011), participate in tests of the pipeline and software tools used for quality assurance, data delivery and plan pipeline operations, archive operations and also in the setup of the archives.
Deadline for receipt of applications to be considered for the position is 31 January, 2011.
ALMA System Astronomer
ALMA System Astronomers are the experts on the performance of ALMA, and provide advice and assistance to ALMA operations. They work closely with the System Engineers in the ALMA Department of Engineering.
Main Duties and Responsibilities:
When ALMA is in full operations, System Astronomer duties will consist of:
The successful candidates will be expected and encouraged to conduct their own astronomical research. Research in areas directed towards use of ALMA will be strongly encouraged.
Deadline for receipt of applications to be considered for the position is 31 January, 2011.
European ALMA Community Days: Towards Early Science | Apr 6/7
Garching, Germany. While ALMA Full Science Operations are estimated to begin in 2013, the increasing capabilities of the growing array will become available to the astronomical community following the start of Early Science Operations in the second half of 2011. During the first phase of Early Science, an array of 16 antennas will be offered for interferometry with four frequency bands and a limited range of baselines. Early Science observations are currently estimated to be scheduled for at most one third of the available time, the remainder being reserved for continuing commissioning and science verification activities.
Scientific users will interact with the ALMA facility through their local ALMA Regional Centre (ARC), which will provide user support on all aspects related to observing with ALMA and assist observer teams throughout the lifecycle of their project. The European ALMA community is supported by a network of regional ARC nodes that are coordinated by the central European ARC hosted at ESO Headquarters in Garching, Germany.
With the ALMA Community Days, the ESO ARC aims to prepare the European astronomical community for ALMA Early Science operations. The first day will be dedicated to a series of scientific and technical presentations related to ALMA and Early Science capabilities, while the second day will be taken up by interactive tutorials on the preparation of ALMA observing proposals using the ALMA Observing Tool (OT). This should help novice and advanced ALMA users alike to create observing projects that optimally exploit the unique capabilities of ALMA during Early Science operations.
Further information can be found at:
or by emailing:
If you wish to receive email announcements when new editions become available, please send an email to
, with "subscribe ALMA newsletter" in the body. To find out if you are already on the email list, send an email to
, with "which" in the body. This newsletter is also available in PDF here